In handling an ethical dilemma at work, which sequence best describes the process?

• A. Ignore the policy and act.
• B. Consult only with peers informally.
• C. State the dilemma, follow policy/integrity, consult mentors or compliance, and decide.
• D. Hope it resolves itself.

Answer: (C)

The main idea here is handling an ethical dilemma with a structured, responsible process that first clarifies the issue, then aligns actions with policy and integrity, seeks appropriate guidance, and finally makes a deliberate decision. Starting by stating the dilemma ensures you know exactly what conflict exists and what standards apply. Following policy and staying true to integrity grounds your actions in what’s allowed and ethically sound, rather than taking a shortcut that could cause harm or violate rules. Bringing in mentors or compliance provides experienced perspectives, helps identify risks or regulatory requirements you might miss, and ensures oversight. With that understanding, you can make a well-reasoned decision and take accountability for it, including how to implement and document it.

This approach is better than actions that ignore policy, which bypass safeguards and can lead to misconduct or legal trouble; or informal, peer-only discussions that may lack necessary authority or raise conflicts of interest; or hoping the issue resolves itself, which leaves the risk unaddressed and could worsen over time.